Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin BRONZ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
