Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX
