Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin BRONZ 6000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
