Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
71.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
