Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin FRIZ
Spinning
49.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/190

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Delphin FRIZ, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin FRIZ may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin FRIZ and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin FRIZ
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
