Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
57.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/430

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 30X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin HORNET 30X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin HORNET 30X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin REDIX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
