Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
