Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
