Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
