Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
