Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
