Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
