Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin REDIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX
