Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX
