Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX edges out Delphin INKS 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Delphin INKS 3000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX
