Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX edges out Delphin INKS 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Delphin INKS 4000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX
