Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (520g / 18,34oz). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
