Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.6 inch) and the weight (185g / 6,53oz). Still, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.6 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
