Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X offers a gear ratio of 5.1:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
