Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X offers a gear ratio of 5.1:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
