Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
