Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
