Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8.11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
