Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (520g / 18,34oz). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
