Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
93.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000X clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Stella FK?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX
