Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
