Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
