Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXPERA
Spinning
2000x
61.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/400

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin IXPERA 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin IXPERA 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXPERA and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin IXPERA 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin REDIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
