Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
59.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight289g / 10.19oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin IXTREK 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXTREK 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
