Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 800X edges out Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.71 out of 10). Still, Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 245g / 8,64oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Daiwa TANACOM?
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa TANACOM 800X
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
