Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X edges out Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.72 out of 10). Still, Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.1:1 and a weight of 300g / 10,58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Daiwa TANACOM?
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin FRIZ


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
