Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.56 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
