Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
74.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.20/220

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 2000X and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 2000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Penn Battle III 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
