Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 81 centimeter / 31.89 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 4000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
