Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX

Delphin SHARX

Spinning

54.70 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.09 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight273g / 9.63oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €69.95
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Shimano FX

Spinning

62.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Conclusion

Both Delphin SHARX 4000X and Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 4000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano FX?

Delphin SHARX 4000X

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX

Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues