Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and the weight (200g / 7,05oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX
