Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Solid value at €389.80, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
