Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX
