Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
85.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €579.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 140/0.14

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stella FK 1000X and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stella FK 1000X offers a maximum drag of 3kg / 6,61lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Stella FK 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
