Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
