Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
