Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (14,9kg / 32,85lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Levelwind?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
- At a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
