Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and ball bearings (3+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano FX?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X
