Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
88.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €420.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 20/270
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 10IIX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica II 10IIX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Talica II?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Shimano Talica II 10IIX
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
