Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
