Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
