Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
