Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
