Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X
