Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
