Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
