Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 8.7 out of 10 (92cm / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX
