Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X
